Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1007020060040010028
Korean Soceity of Osteroporosis
2006 Volume.4 No. 1 p.28 ~ p.35
Clinical Implication of Biochemical Bone Markers in the Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Shin So-Young

Yoon Byung-Koo
Kim Ji-Young
Shin Kyung-Ja
Kim Joo-Han
Min Yong-Ki
Choi Doo-Seok
Bae Duk-Soo
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the clinical significance of baseline levels of and short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover with hormone therapy(HT) in predicting changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in Korean postmenopausal women.

Methods: We studied 238 healthy postmenopausal women. Eighty women took HT for 2 years and 158 remained untreated. At baseline and month 3, concentrations of serum osteocalcin(OC) and urinary deoxypyridinoline(D-pyr) were checked as a marker of bone formation and resorption, respectively. BMDs at both lumbar spine and femur were measured at baseline and years 1 and 2.

Results: In untreated women with high D-pyr level(¡Ã6nM/mM Cr) at baseline, more bone loss(% change, mean¡¾SEM) at total hip was observed at year 2 compared with those with normal D-pyr (-2.0 0.7 vs. 0.5¡¾5.5, P£¼0.05). There was a positive correlation between baseline OC level and BMD change in lumbar spine at year 2 in HT group(r=0.23, P£¼0.05). However, no significance correlation was found between changes in bone markers at month 3 and those in BMD at year 2 in HT group. BMD changes at year 2 were also comparable according to response pattern to HT at month 3 in women with high bone turnover at baseline

Conclusions: Basal measurements of biochemical bone markers might be useful in predicting BMD change at year 2. However, follow-up measurement at 3 months of HT has limited usefulness in predicting treatment response.
KEYWORD
Osteoporosis, Biochemical markers, Bone mineral density, Hormone therapy
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø